In recent days both Courier Life and The Brooklyn Paper have written about recent efforts by the Brooklyn City Council delegation to pass bills intended to (a) make small businesses offer their employees mandatory paid sick leave and (b) institute a kind of rent control for commercial leases. I'm at a loss to decide which policy is worse.
The reason that small businesses are routinely exempted from labor laws like mandatory sick leave is that a company with few employees often lacks the financial resources to cover the extra expense and even less frequently has the employees necessary to cover for sick employees. While the impact on employment overall is probably overstated - the law would likely not lead to massive layoffs or business closings - some struggling businesses would get severely hurt by the imposition. Part of working for a small business is the knowledge that you are working for the kind of company that can't give you the benefits that Starbucks does.
On the other end of the spectrum, rent control for commercial leases is preposterous. I support rent stabilization (if not old-school rent control) for large residential apartment buildings despite the negative affect it has on the condition of rental housing and the rental market generally. I am willing to have the economy suffer in order to prevent the disruption and upheaval to individuals and families that would result if landlords could easily oust their tenants once a neighborhood became hot or the economy as a whole started improving faster as a whole than it did for the most vulnerable populations.
But commercial leases? No way. Yes, it is disruptive to have to close a business because it isn't profitable enough to meet the new lease terms. It is unfortunate for the patrons of that business to have to find a new way to meet that need. It is not, however, the city's responsibility to prop up small businesses that can't survive on their own.
In other words, the legislators are trying to simultaneously support businesses that don't earn enough to survive AND burden those businesses with substantial labor costs. Brilliant. And to think that this is supported by all of the candidates that I endorsed in the last election. *sigh*
In other, better, news, and in an attempt to regain my left-wing cred, kudos to the New York Court of Appeals, which upheld the decision of the New York Department of Civil Service to extend marriage benefits to same-sex couples with valid out-of-state marriages and congratulations to my sister-in-law, who wrote one of the amicus briefs in support of the State's decision. It was a narrow ruling by a bare majority and may not withstand later challenges for boring legal reasons ... but today I'll enjoy the good news.
Recent Comments