In light of last week's New York Observer article about gentrification in Prospect Lefferts, I thought I'd post this 1978 essay by James Greene. This piece appeared in THE (original) BROWNSTONER, a newsletter published beginning in the late 1960s by the Brownstone Revival Committee.
While the Observer article was sloppy and narrowly drawn, comments by its critics (PLGers and non) tended to be just as shallow. Perhaps some day a local journalist will write something intelligent about gentrification. In the mean time, here's Greene, writing at at a time when the very word "gentrification" was relatively new. The article isn't perfect; it doesn't deal with race at all (an important oversight). But it points the way to showing that—then as now—attacks on gentrification are ridiculously simplistic.
- - - - - -
Attack from a New Quarter: Urban Gentrification
by James Greene, 1978
(Reprinted in THE BROWNSTONER, April 1985)
Individually or in groups, the people attempting to revitalize our cities' declining neighborhoods have long faced several natural enemies: negligent city agencies, indifferent or conflict-ridden legislators, and extreme political groups who see the brightest change for revolution in promoting decay and poverty. We can deal with these.
But now comes opposition from a new quarter. The sociologists, whose past recommendations to politicians helped lay waste our urban landscapes, have invented a new field of study which permits them to question this madness of community improvement. It is termed gentrification--movement of the "gentry" into lower-class neighborhoods, disturbing cohesiveness and generally such devotion to keeping the covenant intact resulted in raising hell with the social "balance" of the slums. The concern with gentrification began in Britain, where sturdy brick houses occupied for generations by the "working classes" are being bought and refurbished by the upper-middle class.
Now, "gentrification" studies are being launched in the United States. Ironically, it is not the improvement of neighborhoods that is studied, but the assumed deleterious impact of improvement--displacement of the poor, reduction in the number of housing units, creation of new "social pathologies." Consequently, neighborhood revitalization programs are being asked to defend themselves.
Recent Comments